Planet formation and destruction via gravitational instability

This graphic shows a computer simulation of a circumstellar disk that orbits a young star, with each snapshot showing the state of the disk 1,500 years later. This disk is gravitationally unstable, which means that the disk's gravitational attraction for itself causes material to contract into spirals that can also clump up further to form Jupiter-mass protoplanets. The black circles in the above (click picture to zoom in) follow one such clump that first forms at a distance of 300 AU (ie 300 times the Sun-Earth distance) from the central star, which then spirals inwards due to its interactions with the disk. This simulation illustrates one of the difficulties in forming giant planets via gravitational instability, since the clumps that do form by this process also tend to get driven inwards by the disk, where they might accrete onto the central star. For additional details, see the preprint by Zhu and colleagues.

Spiral arms in disk suggests unseen planets

This image of the disk that is in orbit about the young star SAO 206462 suggests that this disk might be perturbed by one or more unseen planets. This image was acquired at the Japenese Subaru telescope in Hawaii by Carol Grady (Eureka Scientific). In this image, the central star is deliberately masked by the telescope's optics, which revealing a broad disk of gas and dust in orbit about the star. The size of this disk is at least twice the diameter of our Solar System. Planets are known to form in these circumstellar disks, and computer simulations of this process show that a young giant planet can also launch spiral density waves in such a disk. So this disk's spiral appearance does suggest that giant planets may have formed here. But keep in mind that this is not the only explanation. For instance, the gravity of passing star can also disturb a disk, and such a disturbance would wind-up over time and also resemble a spiral. But further study of this system may one day reveal whether the disk at SAO 206462 is indeed planet forming. See this press release for more details.

Free floating planets might outnumber the stars in the Galaxy

A recent gravitational microlensing survey indicates that there may be twice as many free floating planets in our Galaxy than stars. Gravitational microlensing is the brightening that occurs when a dim but massive object passes along the line of sight to a more distant brighter object. According to Einstein's theory of relativity, mass bends spacetime, so the path followed by a light ray is deflected (ie lensed) if passing near enough to a star or a planet. So an astronomer observing a lensed star will see it brighten for a month or two if a very dim star (such as a white dwarf or neutron star) passes near the line of sight (LOS). This also occurs if a planet passes near the LOS, but the lower mass planet has a smaller gravitational influence, so the lensing event is briefer, only a few days.

This is illustrated in the above figure, which shows an otherwise steady star brightening by 40% during three days. These planetary microlensing events are quite rare, so astronomers must continuously monitor millions of stars just to detect 10 such microlensing events in one year. From the observed frequency of these microlensing events, it can be shown that most of the lensing objects are free-floating Jupiter-mass planets that are not bound to any star. But this unusual finding is consistent with some models of planet formation, which predict that when multiple planets form around a star, the planets' gravitational interactions can eject one or more planets from the system. Those ejected bodies are free-floating planets, and their fate is to roam the Galaxy unseen, except in these microlensing surveys. These results were obtained by astrophysicists T. Sumi and K. Kamiya (Osaka Japan) and others, with further details reported in their preprint.

Mass transfer in circumstellar disks

The left graphic is a near-infrared image of the heirachical star system SR24. The lower object is the star SR24S, and the nebulosity surrounding it is a protoplanetary disk that is composed mostly of hydrogen gas plus some dust. The stellar contribution to this image has been subtracted, which is why the disk appear dark in its center. The upper object SR24N is actually an unresolved binary star; that binary also has its own circumbinary disk such that the SR24N stellar pair + disk orbits the SR24S star + disk. The right graphic is a computer simulation of this system, which reveals that these two disks can transfer mass between each other through a `bridge' that passes through this system's L1 Lagrange point, which is one of three sites in this system where gravity + Coriolis forces balance to zero. Observations such as this will hopefully reveal whether binary stars might one day form planets, or if their disks are too disturbed to produce planets. This image was acquire by Satoshi Mayami at the Subaru Telescope. A preprint on this work is also available.

A big expoplanet in a wide orbit

The circled dots indicate the 8 Jupiter mass planet that was discovered by David Lafrenière and colleagues as it orbits the star 1RXS J160929.1-210524. A preprint is also available. These infrared images of the system are acquired at wavelengths of 3 (left) and 4 (right) microns. This giant exoplanet orbits about 300 AU away from the primary star (cross), which is quite remarkable, because current models of planet formation generally do not produce such large planets orbiting at such great distances from the star. However, binary stars do exist at these separations, so one might wonder whether these objects really are large exoplanets, or are perhaps rather small stars.

Giant exoplanet confirmed orbiting in debris disk

Beta Pictoris b is a giant extrasolar planet, having a mass of about 10 Jupiter masses. It was first detected by direct imaging in 2003, but not seen again in followup images acquired in 2008, so the suspicion then was that this faint dot was just a background star, and not a planet that is actually bound to the star. However that expolanet was later recovered again in images acquired in late 2009 by Anne-Marie Lagrange; those images show that the dot seen above is indeed bound to Beta Pictoris, and orbits at a distance of about 10 AU from the star. So it seems that beta Pic b wasn't seen in 2008 because it was passing in front of or behind the very much brighter star.

Beta Pictoris is also known for its huge circumstellar debris disk; that disk is seen edge-on by astronomers at Earth, and the above graphic---which by the way is not a real telescopic image, but is probably the merger of two separate images---shows that the planet's orbit is coplanar with the debris disk. This in fact is to be expected, because such debris disks are composed of dust grains that are produced by collisions among unseen planetesimals, which are also the seeds from which planets form from. See this press release from the European Southern Observatory for more details.

Circumstellar debris disk orbiting HD 32297

This is the circumstellar debris disk that orbits the star HD 32997, imaged with the Palomar 5m telescope by Dimitri Mawet and colleagues. The star lies at the cross, but its light has been blocked by a phase mask coronograph, which is a device that shifts the phase some of that starlight so that the star's light waves interfere with itself destructively, effectively making the very bright star dissapear from this image. This is very useful, since it also reveals the light from the much fainter circumstellar material.

The colored blobs indicate that there is a ring or perhaps a disk of dust in orbit about this star, with that disk/ring seen nearly edge on. The dust grains are visible because they are reflecting starlight, and the colors indicate the intensity of that reflected light. Of particular interest to me is the asymmetry seen in this disk, with one side being brighter than the other by ~50%.

These dusty disks usually have rather short lifetimes, since dust grains destroy each other when the collide with each other. Consequently, other unseen `planetesimals' are implicated here, since collisions by these asteroidal or cometary bodies are needed to continually resupply the disk with the dust seen here. And since comets or asteroids are evidently forming in this system, it seems plausible that larger planets might have formed here, too. Additional details are also available in the paper by Mawet et al.

Planetary-sized impacts around HD 172555?

Casey Lisse (JHU/APL) and colleagues recently used the Spitzer Space Telescope to collect infrared spectra of the dust that orbits the relatively young 12 million year-old star HD 172555. Their observations are described in this preprint. Their spectra shows that this star's circumsteller dust is, as expected, rich in silicate, which is the principle ingredient in circumstellar dust. What is surprising here is that this dust is a glassy silicate, like tektite or obsidian, which tends to form when rocky bodies collide at high speeds of ~10km/sec. These spectra also indicate the presence of ample amounts of SiO gas, which is vaporized rock. From these spectra, Lisse and colleagues infer that this system suffered a recent giant impact via the collision of two large ~1000km bodies (the size of Ceres, the largest asteroid in our Solar System). They estimate that this giant impact occurred within the past ~100 thousand years. There are two possible interpretations of these observations. (1) Collisions among ~1000km-sized protoplanets at HD 172555 indicate that this system is currently undergoing planet formation. This is an important step in the planet-formation process, and is necessary if one wishes to ultimately produce a system of ~10,000km-sized terrestrial planets. (2) Alternatively, giant impacts are instead destroying the protoplanets that orbit HD 172555, and that astronomers are witnessing the collisional destruction of a young planetary system. Which outcome is more likely is presently unclear. See this Spitzer page for more details, as well as the above artist's rendition of a giant impact.